Fiction Critique, HALP!
So I'm reading the latest story up for workshop in my class, and it's not like it's...bad, writing wise. But it was written by this perfectly nice, unassuming freckly white girl. And the story...it's about a Saudi Arabian girl dealing with the death of her mother and opression in Saudi Arabia. I mean, I'm not saying she should write a story about something that exactly happened to her, but this situation is just so clearly far removed from anything she's experienced, that it rings really false. I'm just trying to figure out why she would have chosen to write a story like this. It's just...awkward. It's like she read the Kite Runner or something and was like, it worked for that guy.
So I don't really know how to critique this.
Also, it's in 14pt font. WTF?
Replies
OH, my professor would have a field day with this. :) He's of the aesthetic that you have to write what you know. Aka, I'm only allowed to write characters 24 and younger, female, of my decent. Also, I wasn't allowed to write jobs I hadn't had [talk about limiting].
Though, I don't completely buy it. Depending on what level class this is, this could be a whole world of hurt. Maybe mention that the character doesn't feel authentic - but try not to say - YOU SUCK. :)
I'm trying to think of how I'd critique the story. I'd probably try to avoid the elephant in the room and see how the professor handles it. And react on more revisable sections - rather than telling her to put it in a drawer and never look at it again [which I've heard from faculty].
Maybe ask questions about the character - try to really get her to consider where she's drawing this character from. Maybe she's not sure of the cultural differences. Obviously to write from a remove - you have to do a LOT of research about the culture. That might be something to bring up too, that it feels too removed when it should be steeped in culture, but not forced - something that doing a LOT of historical/cultural/biographical info would help - aka not reading fiction as your "source".
And if your workshop is structured like mine is - she'll have to revise it by the end of the semester - so do your best to give her some help. Maybe talk about how maybe a death of the character seems to forced in the situation? I just like to say no death in general. And force her out of that comfort zone.
Anyway, I hope that helps.
Ah Sharon you are SO helpful!
I'm just anticipating how awkward it will be to critique this story. This is for an intro to fiction class, so I mean, I wasn't expecting greatness, but I wasn't expecting THIS MUCH awkwardness. Intro to fiction here follows a basic intro to creative writing where we do poetry and short stories. I kind of hoped that the quality would be a little better than it was in that class, bu alas. Not really.
And I'll definitely be saying something along the lines of not forcing the culture. Because I can tell that she knows what she's talking about, more or less. She might have taken some religion classes or something, but it's very, very, very forced.
Yea, what point of view is it? I can probably give more advice along those lines too.
It's first person. That was pretty much the only requirement for our first story.
So, you might notice with her first person that she's calling into account things of important that a person of that background would pay no attention to, but because it's different for the writer - they may make more mention of it. I hope that makes sense.
From the character's standpoint they aren't going to make a big deal of the everyday - they'll mention it in passing but not expand upon it in great detail. While to a writer not of that cultural identity they may belabor these details because they're different from their own view point.
That's perfect! My brother told me I should just write something along the lines of "You're white, stop it."
You're much more helpful.
First off, don't make assumptions about what she knows, you'll make yourself look like an idiot.
Also, if the writing seems credible in and of itself, how is the source at all important?
I mean, really, you're being ignorant and prejudiced here.
I mean, unless you're actually from Saudi Arabia, and it shows that she has no idea what she's talking about. If that's the case, you can completely ignore me.
But the writing is terrible! She made up words. According to the dictionary, garrot is a noun meaning a stick that helps close a wound or something along those lines, and she used it as a verb....?
And I did say it wasn't bad, but going through it again I've discovered that there's all this unclear language, and at least six tense shifts.
Sigh. I mean obviously I'm not going to go to class and is there and tell this girl she has no idea what she's talking about. That's rude, a personal attack, etc. I mean, maybe she does. It's just the way the story is written, it seems more like maybe she studied Islamic culture/Saudi culture somewhere and decided she knew enough to write a story.
And yeah, that IS me making an assumption. Buuuuuuuut as far as I'm concerned, it's pretty justified.
Colloquial language is full of "made up words".
All I'm saying is that you should not be interpreting the piece by what you think of the artist. If there are fundamental issues with the actual writing, focus on that.
Why shouldn't she be allowed to write whatever she wishes?
Sure, you could be right. You could also be wrong. Just because she's white doesn't mean she doesn't know the culture intimately.
My aunt, super white, is married to a Muslim man from Libya. If you saw her without the hijab, you'd never know better.
@Corey - the point was she was FORCING the culture. From a point of view story in first person - you don't go around announcing everything that's AMERICAN, when you're in America. Maybe if this was told from the perspective of a white girl visiting Saudi then she would be noticing these things, but instead it sounds like she's bringing to life points that are pretty mundane that a person of that culture wouldn't focus on.
I'm sure the girl did some research, but is probably not steeped enough in an intro to creative writing class to be emmersed. Or if she is knowledgable of the culture - then she needs to make light of the issue with first person character's observations not lining up with this.
I'm all for writing what you don't know, but when you're starting out it's important to have a steady base for which to grow from. But what do I know. I only want to teach creative writing for a living. I was just giving her advice that's valid from a workshop stand point that would be brought up in any of the workshops I've ever been in.
So yes, it sucks that we make assumptions based on the writer - but she made the assumptions based on the writing, and then evaluated the girl to some hints. It's like when I write a story from a guy's point of view - it's more in jeopardy of being analyzed that I am in fact a girl - writing a male point of view. And that can come out as quickly as just reading the author's name at the top of the story. While new criticism has been a huge deal in the 20th century, we cannot completely ignore the author anymore. Especially in an intro to writing course. It's ambitious - so I'd give her points from that, but I might try to steer her to something more in her everyday life until she builds the tools necessary to execute a story from outside her everyday experiences.
Sharon, you are making yourself look even more prejudiced and ignorant than sosane. You haven't even read the piece, have you?
Neither of you have shown any reason as to how you know she's "forcing the culture". Sosane even said herself "... I can tell that she knows what she's talking about, more or less...". You're both assuming that she actually doesn't know what she's talking about because she's a white girl.
Ignorant, ignorant, ignorant.
Maybe she felt it was important to stress the "mundane"? Maybe she felt like informing people of how things really are?
I was just asking for advice on how to critique the story respectfully, because in class I don't want to make the assumption that she doesn't know what she's talking about. Sharon gave me some very helpful ideas about how to do so. The point of my problem is that, while the writer knows the technical aspects of the culture well enough, there is no intimate connection to the culture present in the writing.
PS. Don't call Sharon or me ignorant. I'm the one who's read the piece. I probably shouldn't have made such a big deal about the writer, whatever, but because of the lack of intimacy with the culture in the writing, I feel like she hasn't personally experienced the culture.
But apparently I'm not supposed to make any kind of judgment at all based on what I've read in connection with the author. After all, I'm only supposed to be giving this girl suggestions on improving her writing.
No, I haven't. That's not the point. Writing from the viewpoint of a person thoroughly entrenched in a very specific, very real culture requires a certain degree of finesse and proficiency as a writer to be pulled off by a person who is not also a part of that culture. In my opinion, which is what you're supposed to provide when critiquing something, this piece was not written in a way that makes the character seem believable as a member of that culture. Being knowledgeable about something doesn't mean you understand it, and I can tell the difference between a person writing about something they just know things about and writing about something they truly understand. If the writer understood the culture, it would come across in the writing, and the culture would not figure so prominently in the story. Obviously, in a story like this, the culture is important, but it should still not be shoved at the reader every other sentence, reminding them of the distance between them and the character.
Well put and point taken.
It is, however, still possible that she completely understands the topic but is a terrible writer.
The whole point I was trying to make is that you can't discount what she is writing about simply because she doesn't appear to be of that culture.
Garrotte is a verb, meaning to choke to death with wire around the neck. It is also a noun -- the weapon itself. Making up words is cool; her misspelling them troubles me more.
Critique the writing if the writing is bad and that is the nature of your workshop, but I wouldn't recommend you criticize her for writing about something you think she isn't able to imagine or for making up words.
As a writing teacher, its pretty important to me that people are free to make up words and to use their imagination.
Corey,
She's not discounting the writing. She was looking for suggestions on how not to be a dick when the writing isn't up to par. This is a reader-response based approach to writing. If a reader doesn't believe the character they'll say so. My own professor JUST Monday told me my characters didn't feel authentic and this is due in part that he KNOWS I'm a twenty something, white, female. But his aesthetic is that you should NOT write out of your demographic.
Now all professors do not believe this. Some think it is a VERY useful to write outside your demographic. However, for an intro to writing class this is VERY ambitious. I applaud the girl for being ambitious. Given I've probably read hundreds of student written stories, I have a GOOD idea as to what's probably occurring in the text without actually reading it. I said it's LIKELY she's doing this. If that's so - you should respond to something along these lines.
I did not say she was for a FACT doing that. Instead from the way Sosane spoke about it, I was inferring the possibility. You can't tell me you've never made assumptions based on the facts before you - ever. In this case, I would AGAIN tell the girl, that I really appreciated her ambitious nature but that there were several red flags for me. In Sosane's case, she feels there's not enough personal connection to the material. From the sounds of it, the story sounds more like an anthropological view point.
While I wasn't telling Sosane to say VERBATIM my opinion. I was offering her suggestions for dealing with this situation. Sometimes it's HARD to give constructive criticism - and if you look at my advice, none of it is prejudice or ignorant or rude. I told her to make comments BASED on the writing in front of it. I told her to focus on things HAPPENING in the story regardless of the nature of the story. When it comes down to it, you have to comment on craft. Note where are sections she's using description well, where are places that she's belaboring that the story takes place in Saudi.
And I don't believe Sosane ever discounted the quality of the writing just because of the nature of the subject matter having anything to do with the girl not appearing to be Saudi. Instead, she read the story - felt it was forced and then came to the realization that maybe, this student didn't have an intimate connection to the culture because of the lack of intimate connection in the story.
CAPS.
i agree with bs&e. making up words can be useful. misusing them less so, unless it's character-appropriate. perhaps just make a note that you were not clear on the usage.
i don't think it's wrong to tell someone their writing seems forced, and i don't think it's wrong to tell someone you're not sure they know what they're talking about.
it's the way you say things.
a writer- a good writer- should want these opinions. it doesn't mean she has to listen, but it's good to know what people think.
I was rather confused by the use of garrot or garrote as a verb because it was used like this: "My child, you are looking for some fabric today?" he garroted out in the deep and struggling voice of a sick man.
I mean, I'm certainly guilty of turning words that aren't verbs into verbs, etc, but, after I looked it up, I think the effect here is not what was intended.
But y'know, that's not a huge deal within the story. Anyways, I really appreciate you guys giving me some good comments to work with. I know most people in my class probably wont be as concerned with their critiques as I am, but what can I say...I'm an English nerd.
@sharon: Note how sosane felt it important to disclose the writer's skin color before telling us what the story was about? She then went on to say that it was "so clearly far removed from anything she's experienced" as if to say that there is no way this little white girl knows anything about Saudis or the loss of a mother. I get the feeling that sosane doesn't really know anything about this girl.
Your opinion basically amounted to "A person of a certain culture would make light of anything in that culture" which is completely ridiculous. It's like saying that inner-city rappers shouldn't rap about gang violence because it's part of their culture.
Neither of you are familiar with the culture, by your own admission. Yet somehow you know she is out of touch with it.
i don't think that's what was meant at all- i think she meant that a person inside of a culture wouldn't necessarily point things out (that an outsider would mention) because they are the norm in the culture. they would go without saying.
that's what i thought.
indeed, but would you explain something to us that we already knew about our culture? for instance, if you were writing a story about a family getting together for easter dinner, would you explain easter? the easter bunny? or just pass over the reference assuming people knew what you were talking about?
because in THIS culture (caps!) they do.
Oh, my bad. I didn't know that sosane's class was full of Saudis. Please disregard everything I've said.
what you're writing isn't just for the class, dude.
you have a greater audience. perhaps she'd like to publish someday.
have you done writing workshops?
So what you're saying is that everyone in the US is a Saudi? In the world?
I get the point you're trying to make, but it's not a good point to make.
Her audience probably isn't Saudi Arabians, but you don't know that Saudi Arabians wouldn't like it.
i'm sorry, it's not a good point to make? LOL.
it's a style issue- somethings you just have to leave out, or you're writing a textbook.
if she calls attention to too many cultural differences, it becomes less about the story and more about the setting. if you want your reader to relate to a character, to get involved with the character, it's difficult to explain culture.
there are ways around this: for example, memoirs of a geisha. in this instance, the character is also learning about geisha life, so we get to learn through her.
So it has to be about whores or something Japanese to talk about the culture?
I knew I could figure this whole writing thing out with your help!
My bestselling novel will be forthcoming.
i'm not saying that you can't explain things, but the way in which one does so is important.
but by all means, get sarcastic and huffy. helpful!
I would tend to agree.
The way in which sosane explained her situation, without any exerpts from the writing, makes it appear as though she's judging the white girl's knowledge of Saudi Arabia based on the fact that she has white skin and freckles.
James Joyce did a wee tad more that "make up" in Finnegans Wake, which is in my opinion, one of the greatest books of the 1900's even if nobody has the patience to read it.
I'm sensitive about subject matter because in grade 2 I wrote a story about a slave girl learning how to read for a contest and some story called "Mr. Fantastic Burp Man" won. Hardly any of the students even read mine. :(
I would be curious to see what she has written. I often find rather unorthodox fiction brilliant. Ghostie is rather a hyper critical girl when it come to writing. It's kind of hilarious given my general laziness.
AHEM. Look, I already admitted that perhaps my mentioning that the girl is white and has freckles was not the best or most relevant piece of information to divulge. BUT, as I have since mentioned, upon reading the story, it was apparent to me that (regardless of whether or not this girl has any actual experience at all with Saudi culture) the author does not appear to have a thorough understanding of the culture and how a member of that culture would perceive things, and so the story comes across as forced.
TO clarify - the way pepper has explained it is how I meant it.
It's the same way when a character talks about the home they live in, they aren't going to stand in a room and observe the room, if the room is always like that and there's nothing out of the norm about the room. Maybe if they walked into the room and it had been burglarized they would have taken the time to explain how it's in disarray.
You pretty much have to do five things at once and make the description seem embedded in the action. That it's necessary for Paul to mention a light bulb is out in the living room and suddenly the house takes on a gloomier feel - and Paul might notice the books which he normally pays no never mind to because they're his girlfriend Nancy's.
But had the room just been the room it always was, Paul wouldn't pay any attention to these details.
If you see a woman in a burka everyday, you're not going to strike this as unusual from a first person narrator, especially if this person wears one herself. If you pray five times a day, it's not going to strike you as unusual unless you end up praying in an unusual location suddenly, some place you'd never thought you'd have to observe from - like praying on the Eiffel tower while on vacation.
I'm not saying all cultural references won't need some explanation, but unless this first person narrator is talking to someone - telling someone else their story - they're probably not going to stop and take cultural notes for their own story and explain things that are common knowledge for them.
that's the thing. none of us know the story, except sosane. for all we know, it could have been the author's intent to introduce the audience to the culture.

Maybe she had an experience once?